Sony Music Leisure has requested a courtroom in New York to dismiss a lawsuit filed on the finish of 2024 by Patrick Moxey’s impartial writer, Extremely Worldwide Music Publishing.
The lawsuit, filed in November on behalf of Extremely Worldwide Music Publishing LLC (UIMP) and Extremely Music Publishing Europe AG, accused SME of copyright infringement over Sony and its associates’ alleged use of Extremely’s compositions with out a license.
A variety of Sony‘s subsidiaries, together with Extremely Data and AWAL, had been named as defendants.
In a authorized doc filed by Sony Music‘s attorneys on Monday (February 17) in assist of the movement to dismiss, the music firm known as the copyright motion “an ill-conceived effort” to “retaliate in opposition to” Sony Music “for pursuing claims based mostly on Moxey’s unauthorized use of the ULTRA trademark after SME purchased Moxey’s share of Extremely Data from him in 2021.”
Patrick Moxey is the previous proprietor of Extremely Data, which was absolutely acquired by SME in 2021.
SME already owned 50% of the label, which it acquired from Moxey in 2012, after which he continued to run the label as its President and co-owner. Moxey left Extremely Data in January 2022, however continued to totally personal Extremely Worldwide Music Publishing.
In December 2022, Moxey’s publishing firm was sued by Sony-owned Extremely Data over Moxey’s continued use of the ‘Extremely’ identify.
In January 2023, Moxey/UIMP filed a counterclaim in opposition to Sony Music’s lawsuit within the courtroom of the Southern District of New York.
Sony Music mentioned in its movement to dismiss this week that, “in an try to achieve settlement leverage over” Sony within the trademark dispute, Extremely Music Publishing filed its copyright motion “on the eve of trial within the trademark lawsuit”.
The movement added that the impartial Extremely Music Publishing firm tried “to justify that nefarious timing by claiming this lawsuit stems from an audit of the music publishing royalties that SME paid to Plaintiffs”.
Added SME: “But, that audit — which concerned funds made by SME to Plaintiffs by means of 2016 — was settled in precept years in the past for a small fraction of the quantity claimed, and Plaintiffs by no means pursued these audit claims any additional.”
The movement continued: “In November 2024, mere days earlier than the trial within the trademark litigation started, UIMP and its Swiss affiliate commenced this copyright infringement motion, utilizing the long-since resolved audit as a pretext.
SME mentioned that it was “Undaunted by Plaintiffs’ stress tactic” and “tried its trademark claims to a jury, which returned a verdict in December 2024 discovering UIMP chargeable for trademark dilution and breach of contract, and discovering that UIMP had acted in unhealthy religion”. The movement famous that “a last judgment in that case is pending”.
You may learn Sony Music’s movement to dismiss in full right here.
The impartial Extremely publishing firms personal and exploit the copyrights in over 50,000 compositions, which have been recorded by celebrity artists starting from Ed Sheeran and Madonna to Rihanna, Katy Perry, Migos, and plenty of others. Extremely songwriters have been nominated for over 100 Grammy Awards and have gained a number of Grammy Awards.
The unique criticism, which you’ll be able to learn right here, alleged that Sony Music and its subsidiaries had been infringing UIMP compositions by “add[ing] unlicensed sound recordings” of the compositions to streaming providers and promoting “the infringing Sony Recordings as digital downloads and in bodily configurations (comparable to vinyl information)” as effectively a “wrongfully” syncing them in music movies and ‘lyric movies.”
The lawsuit claimed that “though the Extremely Plaintiffs have repeatedly demanded in writing that the Sony Defendants stop and desist from their infringing actions, the Sony Defendants flatly and unequivocally refuse to take action.”
This week, within the memorandum supporting the movement to dismiss, SME’s attorneys argued that the key music firm’s “licensing practices are each applicable and completely in step with the licensing practices of each different main report label that releases new sound recordings, together with report labels that Moxey himself managed prior to now and at present owns.”
“This motion was not introduced as Plaintiffs declare of their Grievance to ‘defend [their] songwriters’, however to actual revenge and exert settlement stress on Defendants.”
Sony Music, in Movement to dismiss
They added: “Furthermore, Plaintiffs’ personal songwriters and producers proceed to write down songs and collaborate with SME artists with the intention and expectation that the ensuing sound recordings incorporating the underlying musical compositions shall be commercially launched — underscoring the apparent query of whether or not Plaintiffs’ tried boycott of SME is of their songwriters’ finest curiosity.
“This motion was not introduced as Plaintiffs declare of their Grievance to ‘defend [their] songwriters’, however to actual revenge and exert settlement stress on Defendants.”
Legal professionals for Sony Music additionally claimed within the movement to dismiss this week that the impartial Extremely Music Publishing’s “improper motivation in submitting this motion is underscored by the slapdash method by which they ready their Grievance”.
They proceed “Plaintiffs don’t allege any info to assist their copyright infringement claims, as an alternative resorting to boilerplate language that merely recites the authorized components of these claims.
“Though Plaintiffs purport to claim infringement of “over 50,000” music works and so they submit a “non-exhaustive” checklist of 100 of these works, they fail to allege (i) the identities of the overwhelming majority of these works, (ii) which of the Plaintiffs controls every of these works, (iii) which of the sixteen defendants Plaintiffs selected to sue are accountable for infringements of the overwhelming majority of these works, (iv) what actions any such defendant took to infringe, (v) when these alleged infringements occurred, or (vi) whether or not these alleged infringements even occurred in the USA such that they could be adjudicated right here.”
In the meantime, addressing what they name the “purportedly infringing conduct” by Sony Music alleged within the Extremely criticism, the corporate’s attorneys argued that “plaintiffs provide solely generalized assertions as to the ‘creation of unauthorized works,’ with out offering any concrete info supporting these assertions”.
They added: “These failures make it not possible for Defendants to discern the claims which might be being introduced in opposition to them, and mandates the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ copyright infringement claims.
“Plaintiffs’ imprecise allegations additionally necessitate the dismissal of their vicarious infringement declare in opposition to SME. All Plaintiffs allege is that SME ‘income from, and has the best and skill to manage, the infringing actions of the opposite Defendants’, which merely recites the authorized components of a vicarious infringement declare, and is inadequate to outlive a movement to dismiss.
“The unsupported allegation that the opposite defendants are SME’s ‘subsidiaries’ or ‘associates’ doesn’t plead SME’s requisite management and direct monetary achieve from the alleged infringements by these different entities, as it’s effectively settled {that a} father or mother/subsidiary relationship, with out extra, doesn’t assist a vicarious infringement declare. Moreover, the Grievance seemingly asserts that SME ought to be each straight and vicariously liable for a similar alleged infringements, which is a authorized impossibility.”
The Courtroom was requested to dismiss all claims asserted in opposition to Sony Music and its subsidiaries, together with Extremely Data, “with prejudice”.
Music Enterprise Worldwide
